Jim Johnson Statement to PCDO members

VIDEO: Jim's Challenge to the Insiders
 
NJTV INTERVIEW: Watch the Video
 
Facebook: Click Here
 
Twitter: Click Here
 
JIM JOHNSON Biography:
 

Jim’s family has called New Jersey home for four generations and began serving the state as soon as they arrived.

Jim grew up in Montclair, the second of three children.  His father was a Marine veteran and a small businessman. His mother worked as a legal secretary, church organist, and music teacher.  While Jim was in high school, she earned her college degree and eventually earned advanced degrees which enabled her to teach, at the college level, later in life, something  she continues to do today.

His parents worked hard, every day – and put education first, despite financial hardships.  With family support, student loans and part-time jobs, Jim earned his undergraduate and law degrees, with honors, from Harvard.

Over three decades of service to the public and in business, Jimhas been tested and is ready to lead New Jersey, clean up Trenton, and open the door to economic opportunity for those who have been shut out and let down for too long.

After law school, Jim served as a federal prosecutor in the Southern District of New York, successfully prosecuting violent drug dealers, white-collar tax evasion, and organized crime – including members of the Genovese crime family and drug dealers who tried to assassinate an undercover detective.

During the Clinton Administration, Jim served in several senior positions within the U.S. Department of the Treasury.  He started as an Assistant Secretary and President Clinton asked him to co-chair the National Church Arson Task Force.  Later, he served as Under Secretary of the Treasury for Enforcement, overseeing the operations of one third of federal law enforcement, including  the United States Secret Service; the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, and the United States Customs Service.  In the wake of the mass shooting at Columbine, Jim saw first hand the deadly results when guns are in the wrong hands and fought to close the gun-show loophole that contributed to the massacre.

At the end of the Clinton years, Jim returned to private practice, where clients brought him in to handle their toughest challenges.  He routinely advised companies who wanted independent reviews of their actions that met tough Department Of Justice standards for independence and thoroughness.  As a partner at Debevoise & Plimpton, Jim was known for his calm demeanor, high ethical standards and insistence on getting the facts right.

In 2009, Jim was selected by a federal judge to oversee the settlement of an affordable housing conflict between the Department of U.S. Housing and Urban Development in Westchester County, NY.   His task was to hold officials accountable for fulfilling the terms of the consent decree. He also developed new, collaborative ways for communities to understand and solve the problems of developing and marketing affordable housing.

For seven years, Jim led the Brennan Center for Justice as chair and, at times, co-counsel, working to protect the right to vote, to reduce both crime and incarceration and to advocate for fairness for families facing foreclosure.  For two years, Jim led the State of New Jersey’s Advisory Committee on Police Standards, formed to develop a set of proposals to ensure that the State Trooper’s progress in eliminating racial profiling became permanent.  His work led to a change in the law that has transformed the relationship between State Troopers and civilian leadership and has withstood the test of time.  In the last two years, Jim brought together members of the civil rights and law enforcement communities in a collaboration known as New Jersey Communities Forward – a project within the NJ Institute for Social Justice.  Adopting a new approach, NJCF contributed heavily to the new policies on police worn body cameras, independent shooting reviews and implicit bias training.

New Jersey needs a new way of doing business – one that brings the wisdom of its people into the process and is forward-looking rather than crisis-driven.  Jim is running for Governor to ensure that all of our voices are heard as we work to improve our public schools, increase wages and benefits for working families, and invest in repairing our roads, bridges, water system, and mass transit.

Jim is married to Nancy Northup, an attorney who heads the Center for Reproductive Rights, a global human rights organization.  They have four children.  Jim’s eldest daughter, Abigail, teaches in the New York City public schools, as does his step-son Miles.  His daughter Amalya is a college freshman and his stepdaughter Natalie is in graduate school for rabbinical studies.

Jim’s mission has always been clear: siding with people against the powerful, to change the way New Jersey works for this generation and the next.

 

National Journal

January 10, 2017

 

Man Versus Money and Machine

Democratic party leaders want to anoint a wealthy ambassador as the next governor of New Jersey, but they’re overlooking one of the more compelling candidates of 2017.

One of the Demo­crats run­ning to be­come the next gov­ernor of New Jer­sey is a former fed­er­al pro­sec­utor who went after or­gan­ized crime rings, an un­der­sec­ret­ary of the Treas­ury in the Clin­ton ad­min­is­tra­tion who scru­tin­ized the fin­ances of in­ter­na­tion­al drug car­tels, and a re­former who has led ef­forts to im­prove com­munity re­la­tions with po­lice in his post-gov­ern­ment­al ca­reer. He boasts a rags-to-riches story as the first mem­ber of his fam­ily to gradu­ate from col­lege. Bor­row­ing from Pres­id­ent Obama’s cam­paign play­book, he is cast­ing him­self as an Afric­an-Amer­ic­an who can heal the di­vi­sions in a polit­ic­ally-po­lar­ized state.

No one is giv­ing Jim John­son, 55, much of a chance against front-run­ning Phil Murphy, 59, the wealthy Gold­man Sachs ex­ec­ut­ive who later be­came Am­bas­sad­or to Ger­many. It’s hard to even find much cov­er­age of John­son’s can­did­acy in the New Jer­sey press. But any­one who un­der­stands the im­port­ance of a com­pel­ling nar­rat­ive in polit­ics should be pay­ing close at­ten­tion to his cam­paign.

The New Jer­sey gov­ernor race—or, at least the Demo­crat­ic primary—is shap­ing up as an early test of the in­flu­ence of money and party bosses. New Jer­sey is one of the few re­main­ing states where un­der-the-radar in­siders wield tre­mend­ous in­flu­ence. Party lead­ers can fun­nel money to their pre­ferred can­did­ates, dis­suade in­terest groups from de­fy­ing the party line, and even de­note the of­fi­cial party pref­er­ence on bal­lots. In the gov­ernor race, that means New Jer­sey Demo­crats could see Murphy’s name in huge typeface on the bal­lot as the party-backed can­did­ate, with John­son (and oth­er primary can­did­ates) de­moted to fine print.

At a time when the en­ergy in the Demo­crat­ic Party is against Wall Street bil­lion­aires, it’s a bit coun­ter­in­tu­it­ive that a can­did­ate in 2017 is favored mainly be­cause of his eye-pop­ping wealth. But with tele­vi­sion ads cost­ing a for­tune to air across the state, self-fun­ded can­did­ates have an auto­mat­ic leg up over the com­pet­i­tion. Former Gov. Jon Corz­ine, an­oth­er Gold­man Sachs alum, pumped over $28 mil­lion of his own money in­to a los­ing reelec­tion cam­paign in 2009. Murphy brought in $7.3 mil­lion of in­come last year alone, ac­cord­ing to fin­an­cial dis­clos­ures, and loaned his cam­paign $10 mil­lion in star­tup money. John­son is start­ing his fun­drais­ing from scratch.

But if there was one les­son of the 2016 pres­id­en­tial cam­paign, it was that money is only as ef­fect­ive as the can­did­ate’s mes­sage. Clin­ton out­spent Trump sig­ni­fic­antly in the battle­ground states to no avail. In­sur­gent can­did­ates now have ef­fect­ive tools to over­come a fin­an­cial de­fi­cit, in­clud­ing di­git­al ad­vert­ising that gen­er­ates vir­al buzz and or­gan­ic ex­cite­ment from on­line so­cial net­works.

“In the last year, if you haven’t been sur­prised with what’s happened with polit­ics, you haven’t been pay­ing at­ten­tion,” John­son told Na­tion­al Journ­al. “I be­lieve in the polit­ics of con­vic­tion, not cal­cu­la­tion. I have lived my life build­ing un­likely co­ali­tions. I be­lieve not only is bridge-build­ing pos­sible but it’s all about who I am. The mes­sage of change that I bring, and track re­cord of change that I have will res­on­ate across the cam­paign.”

John­son’s cam­paign team is fa­mil­i­ar with us­ing an un­tra­di­tion­al play­book to pro­pel un­der­dog can­did­ates. His me­dia strategist John Del Cec­ato brain­stormed the mem­or­able ad for New York City May­or Bill de Bla­sio—fea­tur­ing his Afro-wear­ing son, Dante—that fueled his can­did­acy. Del Cec­ato told Na­tion­al Journ­al to ex­pect a sim­il­ar type of un­con­ven­tion­al ad cam­paign to in­tro­duce John­son to voters. An­oth­er cam­paign ad­viser, Doug Ru­bin, helped elect Dev­al Patrick as the first Afric­an-Amer­ic­an gov­ernor of Mas­sachu­setts. Like John­son, Patrick was a Har­vard Law School gradu­ate with no polit­ic­al ex­per­i­ence pri­or to run­ning — and was ini­tially viewed as a long-shot. He ended up win­ning his primary in a land­slide against the state’s at­tor­ney gen­er­al and a free-spend­ing ven­ture cap­it­al­ist.

John­son will be us­ing a strategy that has been a time-tested for­mula for Demo­crat­ic un­der­dogs: Win over the sub­stan­tial Afric­an-Amer­ic­an vote in a di­verse state, while ex­cit­ing white pro­gress­ives with a story that in­spires en­thu­si­asm. His cam­paign is also bet­ting on the the­ory (cham­pioned by Dav­id Axel­rod) that voters are look­ing for a rem­edy, not a rep­lica from the past. John­son’s wonky nature, soft-spoken de­mean­or, and de­sire for con­sensus couldn’t be more of a con­trast from out­go­ing Gov. Chris Christie.

Out of of­fice, Pres­id­ent Obama has pledged his fo­cus will be on re­build­ing the Demo­crat­ic party, help­ing to build a bench of tal­en­ted of­fice­hold­ers. He’s got an op­por­tun­ity to weigh in right away in a race pit­ting one of his top donors against someone whose rhet­or­ic is re­min­is­cent of his own ideal­ist­ic vis­ion of the past. If the New Jer­sey gov­ernor race was de­cided by résumés, John­son would be con­sidered a top con­tender. But the Demo­crat­ic es­tab­lish­ment’s ral­ly­ing be­hind Murphy is proof pos­it­ive that money, not mes­sage, of­ten makes the party go round.

 

 

( )